|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
BasketballFanNB
Posts: 9 Join date: 2011-02-28
 | Subject: Provincials predictions Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:20 am | |
| now that high school championships are over, who do you guys think are going to win BNB provincials for Midget boys, Midget Girls, Juvenille Boys and Juvenille Girls. The sections are posted on the BNB website. |
|
 | |
BasketballFanNB
Posts: 9 Join date: 2011-02-28
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:12 pm | |
| Here is the classifications:
Juvenile Boys
Section 1
Fredericton North (host) Bathurst Blue Storm Moncton Hurricanes Moncton Storm Soutside Cats
Section 2
Salisbury (host) Campbellton Lancaster McAdam/Harvey River Valley
Section 3
Hillsborough (host) Fred North Lions Fundy Grand Manam Northern Stars Polar Bears
Juvenile Girls
Section 1
Fred Lady Kats(host) Cavaliers Fred North Moncton Blue Tide Moncton Hawkes Northern Carleton Salisbury Cougars Woodstock
Midget Boys
Section 1
Bordertown Boys(host) Fredericton North Moncton Woldpack Northern Carleton 1
Section 2
KV Slammers 1(host) Harvey Lancaster Oromocto Sussex Woodstock
Section 3
Dalhousie (host) Basketball Chaleur Bathurst Frederiction Exhibition Northern Carleton River Valley
Section 4 McAdam (host) DP Eagles KV Slammers B Petitcodiac Saint John Stunners Salisbury
Midget Girls
Section 1
Fred North 1 (host) Fred North 2 KV Slammers 1 Moncton Hawkes Moncton Highlanders Riverview Royals Saint John Vikings Sussex
Section 2
KV Slammers 2(host) Fred South Black Kats Northern Carleton Sackville Saint John Hounds St. Stephen
section 3
Hillsborough(host) Bathurst ESJ Buzzz Elite Fundy MBA Grand Falls Northside Lions C
|
|
 | |
CoachDJR
Posts: 357 Join date: 2010-01-22 Location: Southern NB
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:45 pm | |
| Its almost impossible to tell ahead of time how these things will play out as no one except BNB and the team itself tends to know exactly who they will be bringing. Who can add in pieces/players that make them better without it becoming an collection rather then a team tends to win out in the larger tiers. In the smaller tiers it tends to end up being mostly teams made up from areas who compete well and the winner is the team that managed to get the best players from 2 or 3 local ares together on one team and just has more firepower.
I can give you some scores I've heard from exhibition games lately in Midget girls:
- ESJ Buzz Elite over Saint John Vikings by 8. (Watch out Section 3 for Buzz Elite) - Saint John Vikings over Fundy MBA by 33. - Saint John Vikings over St. Stephen by 30. - Fundy MBA over St. Stephen by 10.
|
|
 | |
timchaffey
Posts: 4 Join date: 2011-03-01
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:34 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
timchaffey
Posts: 4 Join date: 2011-03-01
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:36 pm | |
| How many teams added other players ? |
|
 | |
lhhs booster
Posts: 3 Join date: 2011-03-02
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:33 pm | |
| Hi. I haven't posted in quite a while. I have seen a lot more of the West conference than anything so may be biased towards them! First note is this.......I hear that Gillis will be playing with LHHS girls in the Juvenile so that makes them much more of a threat. |
|
 | |
BasketballFanNB
Posts: 9 Join date: 2011-02-28
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:53 pm | |
| I heard the Harvey midget boys have a some grade tens who played varsity this year. They should be a tough team to beat.
I am saying Juvenile Boys section 1 - Bathurst Section 2 - No idea, but I'm leaning towards McAdam/Harvey or Campbelton.. I thought Salisbury was a section 3 team? Section 3 - Hillsbourough..That is Caledonia high school right? |
|
 | |
obcnamtaf
Posts: 192 Join date: 2009-11-17
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:57 pm | |
| I am told the Fredericton North Juvenile team will be a combination of players from LHHS and Devon Park....which should make a good team even better.... the moncton teams usually have kids from more than one school...that's what makes Juvenile Tier 1 so good....a lot of the top players in NB will be there....and makes for some exciting high caliber play... |
|
 | |
Rudas
Posts: 109 Join date: 2010-01-24
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:06 pm | |
| | BasketballFanNB wrote: | I heard the Harvey midget boys have a some grade tens who played varsity this year. They should be a tough team to beat.
I am saying Juvenile Boys section 1 - Bathurst Section 2 - No idea, but I'm leaning towards McAdam/Harvey or Campbelton.. I thought Salisbury was a section 3 team? Section 3 - Hillsbourough..That is Caledonia high school right? | The Harvey High team were all grade 11 and 12 players except for Nick Kitchen and he is playing for their midget team. Same thing with the McAdam midget team...Anderson is playing down with them. McAdam hosted Woodstock's midget team last week and beat them by about 20. |
|
 | |
ball lover
Posts: 4 Join date: 2011-02-21
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:36 pm | |
| Hillsborough boys team is the grades from the high school team and the grade 11. Hillsborough girls team is the high school minus the grade 12 and two grade 11s, plus a few grade 8s are playing up |
|
 | |
bballer2
Posts: 34 Join date: 2011-03-02
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:43 pm | |
| BNB has re-aligned some of the girl Midget teams, moving Buzzz Elite and another team to Section 2 - i think buzzz elite is the team to watch for in that section! |
|
 | |
timchaffey
Posts: 4 Join date: 2011-03-01
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:55 pm | |
| | obcnamtaf wrote: | | I am told the Fredericton North Juvenile team will be a combination of players from LHHS and Devon Park....which should make a good team even better.... the moncton teams usually have kids from more than one school...that's what makes Juvenile Tier 1 so good....a lot of the top players in NB will be there....and makes for some exciting high caliber play... |
wouldnt it make sence if they were useing the best AA team and the second best AAA they would be in a higher section |
|
 | |
Hardfouls
Posts: 64 Join date: 2010-01-29
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:57 pm | |
| The roster for the juvenile A team called the Blue Storm is all KVHS players... Adam Spurrell (gr. 12) Jarred Crawford (gr. 12) Steve Flanagan (gr. 12) Zac Chambers (gr. 11) Ryan Foster (gr. 11) Ryan Ramier (gr. 11) Erik Nissen (gr. 10) Nathan d'Entremont (gr. 10) Mark Graham (gr. 10)
The team is also playing in the intermediate men's provincials.
|
|
 | |
39forever
Posts: 178 Join date: 2010-11-22
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:01 pm | |
| | Hardfouls wrote: | The roster for the juvenile A team called the Blue Storm is all KVHS players... Adam Spurrell (gr. 12) Jarred Crawford (gr. 12) Steve Flanagan (gr. 12) Zac Chambers (gr. 11) Ryan Foster (gr. 11) Ryan Ramier (gr. 11) Erik Nissen (gr. 10) Nathan d'Entremont (gr. 10) Mark Graham (gr. 10)
The team is also playing in the intermediate men's provincials.
|
This year might be different, we will see. I played in an intermediate tournament with a couple of hig school teams like this and it was not good for the tourny. They lacked the strenght to play at this kind of tourny. Men's intermediate is a much different game than high school ball. It might be good for them, but for the men's teams at the tourny I was at (A division) I don't think we got much out of it. Maybe this group will be different. |
|
 | |
Hardfouls
Posts: 64 Join date: 2010-01-29
 | Subject: Re: Provincials predictions Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:31 pm | |
| | 39forever wrote: | | Hardfouls wrote: | The roster for the juvenile A team called the Blue Storm is all KVHS players... Adam Spurrell (gr. 12) Jarred Crawford (gr. 12) Steve Flanagan (gr. 12) Zac Chambers (gr. 11) Ryan Foster (gr. 11) Ryan Ramier (gr. 11) Erik Nissen (gr. 10) Nathan d'Entremont (gr. 10) Mark Graham (gr. 10)
The team is also playing in the intermediate men's provincials.
|
This year might be different, we will see. I played in an intermediate tournament with a couple of hig school teams like this and it was not good for the tourny. They lacked the strenght to play at this kind of tourny. Men's intermediate is a much different game than high school ball. It might be good for them, but for the men's teams at the tourny I was at (A division) I don't think we got much out of it. Maybe this group will be different. |
They are playing intermediate 'C'. |
|
 | |
|